PARKER: No rush on health care

Opinion

Discussion

March 17, 2010

By Kathleen Parker Syndicated Columnist The Corsicana Daily Sun Wed Mar 17, 2010, 08:07 PM CDT

Washington — As Democrats consider shoving health care reform through the House with a process known as “deem and pass,” it is helpful to return to square one and ask: What, again, is the rush?

A year ago, when reform work got under way, Democrats were hell-bent on passing legislation before year’s end. Because? There was no way, Democrats believed, that they could accomplish such sweeping reform in an election year.

The Senate bill, which still doesn’t have enough votes in the House to pass, barely met the do-or-die deadline, squeaking through on Christmas Eve.

Now the new deadline for a final package is Easter break. This time the thinking goes: If Congress doesn’t get a bill to the president before politicians head home, there will be no health care reform for 10 more years. Come April, their energies are needed on other pressing concerns, such as re-election.

If health care reform as proposed were so good for the nation, why wouldn’t legislators prefer to run on rather than away from that record? If you can’t run on the strength of the laws you pass, then either you shouldn’t be running or you shouldn’t be passing.

Yet, now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is considering new ways to allow House members to pass the Senate bill without actually voting for it so that vulnerable Democrats can deny responsibility for a bill they don’t like and don’t support. Is this sane?

More to the point, is it constitutional?

Some experts say yes; others say no. A thorough vetting would consume this space, but basically, the “deem and pass” maneuver accomplishes the same thing as if the House approved the Senate bill with tweaks through the reconciliation process. Rather than voting on the Senate bill, the House passes a package of changes to the bill. Thus the bill is “deemed” to have passed. Got that?

The benefit is that House members who don’t want to vote for the bill are granted plausible deniability. Come election time, they can say, “Hey, don’t look at me, I didn’t vote for it.” And voters, whom lawmakers apparently deem mentally challenged, will give legislators a pass. This is called implausible optimism.

Deem and pass — or sneak and sprint — may be legal, but is it right?

It’s right only if your goal is to beat a deadline and pass something — anything — regardless of how imperfect the result. Even the majority of Americans who oppose the bill don’t know the half of it, because almost no one does.

What they do know is that health care reform reeks of maneuvering and the kind of compromises that involve sacks of cash. The latest proposed strategy merely underscores the past year’s by-hook-or-by-crook legislative approach.

Even recent attention to “sweetheart deals” has failed to improve the product. President Obama initially said he wanted state-specific deals removed, but now the White House has backed off, saying that if more than one state theoretically could benefit from a deal, then the program is OK.

Theoretically, that could cover just about anything — and everything. Certainly, such an approach helps justify sweeteners such as the so-called “Frontier States” amendment that raises Medicare reimbursements for some rural states at a cost of $2 billion over 10 years.

The deal was added to the Senate bill between its exit from the Finance Committee and the Christmas Eve vote. Coincidentally, it just happens to benefit two powerful Democratic committee chairmen — North Dakota’s Kent Conrad (budget) and Montana’s Max Baucus (finance). Other states deemed worthy of special treatment according to what is essentially an artificial creation — half of each state’s counties must have six or fewer persons per square mile (and bite their fingernails?) — are Wyoming, South Dakota and Utah. Just 51 hospitals will receive the entire $2 billion, according to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.

A sweetheart deal is a sweetheart deal by any other name.

Given the procedural complications, the clear lack of House support, and a raft of dubious deal-making, slowing down wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen to health care reform.

There’s no dishonor in admitting that one was in too big a hurry. But rushing to do the wrong thing is, in a word, idiotic.

—————

Kathleen Parker, an Orlando Sentinel columnist, runs Thursdays and Sundays in the Corsicana Daily Sun. To sound off to this column, e-mail soundoff @corsicanadailysun.com. To comment directly to the writer, e-mail her at kathleenparker@washpost.com.

Text Only

Opinion

Americanism: What It Means To Me
As we enter into this Memorial Day weekend I am reminded of a mandatory essay I had to write on the above subject while attending the NCO Academy at Hamilton AFB, California, way back in 1972.

May 28, 2012 1 Photo
Coffee is good for you (?)
If you read my column with any regularity, you may have picked up on the fact that I am living with a digestive disease.

May 26, 2012 1 Photo
‘Hatfields & McCoys’ should be good TV
Finally, something worth setting the DVR for looms. But it may not come to that. Monday, the History Channel debuts three nights of its new miniseries “Hatfields & McCoys.” Got a feeling I’ll be watching this one without the wife.

May 23, 2012 1 Photo
And so spake The Little Woman...
Well, where to begin. As previously noted in this space The Big Kahuna (my answer to The Little Woman) deigned to afford me some rebuttal space to comment on the human condition as it pertains to husbands, so here goes.

May 22, 2012 1 Photo
Back in the Day
When the last part of the month of May rolls around, I can’t help remembering some of the experiences seniors and their teachers and sponsors shared while preparing for graduation ceremonies at Irving High School back in 1990’s.

May 21, 2012 1 Photo
The Deal
I would have thought by now it’d be pretty simple — perhaps even automatic.
But no.
There are still those who “walk among us” (credit to Jody Dean for that one) who still apparently cannot read or understand simple words, street signs and signals.

May 21, 2012 1 Photo
Approaching dogs scientifically
A research project on whether or not yawns are contagious across species lines has been conducted and it shows that dogs will yawn if their people yawn first, according to an article in the Washington Post.

May 21, 2012 1 Photo
Storm story has happy ending
Most folks I’ve spoken with this week have their storm stories, as do I.
I talked to a slew of folks who had tree and limb damage. Some were philosophical, while others were angry. I’m not sure who there is to be angry at when it’s the weather.
Reminds me of that Persian king Xerxes, whose pontoon ships were sunk in a storm so he ordered his men to go down and beat the sea with chains and poles. It’s a waste of time and effort to get mad at weather.

May 12, 2012 1 Photo
Adventures of an intrepid reporter
You know, they say you have to be somewhat “throwed” to work for a newspaper.
I’m here to tell you, it sure helps.
Reporters have to run out and cover wrecks, fires, hostage situations, bomb scares, and the like. Fortunately, we don’t have an unusually high amount of that going on around here.

May 12, 2012 1 Photo
Nearing Home
Last week the Evangelical Christian Publishers Association met in Chicago and chose Billy Graham’s new book “Nearing Home” as the “2012 Best Christian Book of the Year.” Dr. Graham turned 93 in November of last year.

May 10, 2012 1 Photo
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

PARKER: No rush on health care

Site Map

Contact Us