Corsicana Daily Sun, Corsicana, Texas

Opinion

Discussion

March 17, 2010

PARKER: No rush on health care

By Kathleen Parker Syndicated Columnist

Washington — As Democrats consider shoving health care reform through the House with a process known as “deem and pass,” it is helpful to return to square one and ask: What, again, is the rush?

A year ago, when reform work got under way, Democrats were hell-bent on passing legislation before year’s end. Because? There was no way, Democrats believed, that they could accomplish such sweeping reform in an election year.

The Senate bill, which still doesn’t have enough votes in the House to pass, barely met the do-or-die deadline, squeaking through on Christmas Eve.

Now the new deadline for a final package is Easter break. This time the thinking goes: If Congress doesn’t get a bill to the president before politicians head home, there will be no health care reform for 10 more years. Come April, their energies are needed on other pressing concerns, such as re-election.

If health care reform as proposed were so good for the nation, why wouldn’t legislators prefer to run on rather than away from that record? If you can’t run on the strength of the laws you pass, then either you shouldn’t be running or you shouldn’t be passing.

Yet, now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is considering new ways to allow House members to pass the Senate bill without actually voting for it so that vulnerable Democrats can deny responsibility for a bill they don’t like and don’t support. Is this sane? 

More to the point, is it constitutional?

Some experts say yes; others say no. A thorough vetting would consume this space, but basically, the “deem and pass” maneuver accomplishes the same thing as if the House approved the Senate bill with tweaks through the reconciliation process. Rather than voting on the Senate bill, the House passes a package of changes to the bill. Thus the bill is “deemed” to have passed. Got that?

The benefit is that House members who don’t want to vote for the bill are granted plausible deniability. Come election time, they can say, “Hey, don’t look at me, I didn’t vote for it.” And voters, whom lawmakers apparently deem mentally challenged, will give legislators a pass. This is called implausible optimism.

Deem and pass — or sneak and sprint — may be legal, but is it right?

It’s right only if your goal is to beat a deadline and pass something — anything — regardless of how imperfect the result. Even the majority of Americans who oppose the bill don’t know the half of it, because almost no one does.

What they do know is that health care reform reeks of maneuvering and the kind of compromises that involve sacks of cash. The latest proposed strategy merely underscores the past year’s by-hook-or-by-crook legislative approach.

Even recent attention to “sweetheart deals” has failed to improve the product. President Obama initially said he wanted state-specific deals removed, but now the White House has backed off, saying that if more than one state theoretically could benefit from a deal, then the program is OK.

Theoretically, that could cover just about anything — and everything. Certainly, such an approach helps justify sweeteners such as the so-called “Frontier States” amendment that raises Medicare reimbursements for some rural states at a cost of $2 billion over 10 years.

The deal was added to the Senate bill between its exit from the Finance Committee and the Christmas Eve vote. Coincidentally, it just happens to benefit two powerful Democratic committee chairmen — North Dakota’s Kent Conrad (budget) and Montana’s Max Baucus (finance). Other states deemed worthy of special treatment according to what is essentially an artificial creation — half of each state’s counties must have six or fewer persons per square mile (and bite their fingernails?) — are Wyoming, South Dakota and Utah. Just 51 hospitals will receive the entire $2 billion, according to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.

A sweetheart deal is a sweetheart deal by any other name.

Given the procedural complications, the clear lack of House support, and a raft of dubious deal-making, slowing down wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen to health care reform.

There’s no dishonor in admitting that one was in too big a hurry. But rushing to do the wrong thing is, in a word, idiotic.

              —————

 Kathleen Parker, an Orlando Sentinel columnist, runs Thursdays and Sundays in the Corsicana Daily Sun. To sound off to this column, e-mail soundoff @corsicanadailysun.com. To comment directly to the writer,  e-mail her at kathleenparker@washpost.com.

Text Only
Opinion
  • Corsicana Government Center Mayor: Welcome discussion of alternatives

    During the City Council meeting on Feb. 7, 2012, several people spoke during the public forum asking for the opportunity to vote on whether or not to issue $2,000,000 of debt to build a new animal shelter. In a recent letter I discussed the reasons why I cannot agree to place the items on a Council agenda.

    February 10, 2012 2 Photos

  • Bill Tinsley Kingdom Preview

    My wife and I like going to the movies. We don’t like all movies. We prefer comedies; light-hearted dramas and uplifting stories.

    February 9, 2012 1 Photo

  • Linex publisher.jpg Looking ahead to spring break

    Be careful what you ask for. Sounds straightforward, right? Then why do we keep pressing?
    People tend to hang around with people that think like them, act like them, enjoy common things. Thus, most of my close friends are border-line comedians.

    February 8, 2012 1 Photo

  • Dick Platt As the Super Bowl turns ...

    As I am writing this rant we are about a week and a half into the two-week hiatus between the NFL conference championship games and the Super Bowl. I am already starting to fall into my off-season depression and facing the prospect of having to watch arena football and reruns on the NFL Network.

    February 7, 2012 1 Photo

  • Gelene Simpson.jpg The Gladys We Knew

    If I had to choose someone to describe as a beautiful Christian lady, it would have been Gladys E. (Stratton) Dietel of Dawson who left this world at age 97 on Jan. 28. She had been a member of the Fellowship Sunday School Class at First United Methodist Church of Dawson, and as the teacher of that class, I learned to expect Gladys to put her whole heart into anything she undertook to do.

    February 6, 2012 1 Photo

  • Brown Deanna New09.jpg Food for thought

    If ever you’ve been one, like me, who battles their weight constantly, no doubt you’ve been on some weird diets.

    February 4, 2012 1 Photo

  • Bill Tinsley Jesus’ creed

    Everyone has a creed because everyone believes something. Even atheists have a creed, which is their belief that God does not exist. A creed is simply a statement of what we believe

    February 3, 2012 1 Photo

  • Linex publisher.jpg Super Bowl fever hardly registers here, right?

    It’s the day after National Signing Day, the day of high school realignment. Coaching change talk can be found. The Super Bowl looms.
    But does it feel right?
    Living in North Texas, has getting geeked up for the Super Bowl become harder to do? Would it help if it were not 70 degrees so often lately.

    February 2, 2012 1 Photo

  • Dick Platt In the News!

    There are a couple items in the news this week I would like to report on. Now, mind you, these items are not goofy and zany like Janet Jacobs might

    January 31, 2012 1 Photo

  • Gelene Simpson.jpg Remember these signs?

    When I was growing up on the south side of Corsicana, a great many people were concerned with what they called “signs.” Some were related to animals and some were pertaining to the weather, crops and such. With Groundhog Day coming upon Thursday, Feb. 2, I am reminded of just how often signs were part of our daily lives.

    January 30, 2012 1 Photo